Imagine a compliance platform that is $12,000 a year. How much is it?
What it replaces will decide the final answer.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology environment can eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious work, then $12,000 could be a well-spent amount of money. If a seven-person startup could gather the same evidence manually in a few minutes every month, the cost will be very different.
This is an excellent way to search for Vanta alternatives. Start by asking what platform comes with the greatest features. Find out how much time and effort these features could save your business.
Automated Manufacturing is a Break-Even Point
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily beneficial or harmful. The benefits of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a company in the field of technology which is growing, numerous cloud environments, many applications, and regular changes in access. Continuously gathering evidence manually could be a huge operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence can quickly justify their cost.
Now consider a 10-person startup making preparations for its first SOC 2. It may have a relatively small infrastructure, and the documentation of the evidence could be handled without a lot of automation.
This difference is important when looking at Vanta’s pricing. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are impressive, but they only offer financial value in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is crucial to examine the services, features as well as the quotes and contracts of both platforms. Both are well-established compliance platforms that focus on automation and integrations.
You’ll need to decide on the other thing first. Do you require a compliance platform that integrates? Certain companies would like constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Others prefer to present evidence on their own, especially if the volume of work is low.
Vanta Competitors do not follow the same model
Several well-known Vanta rivals compete in a category that has a similar focus on automation. On the market, there are also platforms with less cluttered designs that focus more on the organization of systems rather instead of connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. Created by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a single workstation, allows for the editing of policies as well as evidence-based guidance. It also allows auditors to examine evidence submitted via access to only read-only.
It is deliberately not connected to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers select and upload the documents they would like to share.
Factor System Access to the Decision
The detachment of integrations is not without its drawbacks. One must manually collect evidence.
It also eliminates integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require standing connections to the company’s operational environment.
Both architectures aren’t universally superior. It is important to ask what tradeoffs are appropriate for your company.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five and 200 participants. Its pricing is publicized rather than needing a sales call to get the initial price. The initial price listed for CertAssist per month is $225 rather than an average of $375.
Let Complexity earn its place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees aren’t necessarily identical to those of an organization with 100 or 500 employees.
Although compliance is easy but a lighter platform might make sense. Automation’s cost-effectiveness can increase as systems, employees and frameworks grow. It’s better to let complexity of compliance technology earn its place.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations simply because they appear impressive on the comparison chart. They’re worth the cost to perform the tasks they are replacing is more costly than doing them manually.